Flying the Fascist Skies



Boy, I miss the days when the future depicted in Terminator appeared ridiculously dystopian. The Washington Times reports:

The legislation would order the FAA, before the end of the year, to expedite the process through which it authorizes the use of drones by federal, state and local police and other agencies. The FAA currently issues certificates, which can cover multiple flights by more than one aircraft in a particular area, on a case-by-case basis.

Drones have been used as surveillance but also as killing devices, particularly in Afghanistan and Pakistan, in the war on terrorism. Hundreds, almost surely, have been snuffed out by these machines, which kill reportedly kill far more civilians than targeted militants. Credible reports indicate that the CIA has a favorite practice of targeting rescuers who show up to help others hurt by these strikes. From the New York Times:

The report, by the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, found that at least 50 civilians had been killed in follow-up strikes after they rushed to help those hit by a drone-fired missile. The bureau counted more than 20 other civilians killed in strikes on funerals. The findings were published on the bureau’s Web site and in The Sunday Times of London. . . .

The bureau counted 260 strikes by Predator and Reaper drones since President Obama took office, and it said that 282 to 535 civilians had been “credibly reported” killed in those attacks, including more than 60 children.

To be clear, I am not suggesting that American politicians and law enforcers will soon be blowing up Americans on American soil with these drones. But we can nevertheless draw some troubling conclusions:

1) High officials of the US government see nothing wrong with having drones fly over the nation spying on the people—and surely no relevant implications for the Fourth Amendment or American liberty.

2) High officials do not foresee any massive public relations fallout from unleashing such surveillance drones when the very government they work for has killed many civilians in its drone warfare abroad.

3) High officials are likely correct about the latter, as the public appears relatively accustomed to significant assaults on their privacy, particularly since 9/11, and seem to trust the government to wage war at home and abroad. Significant precedents in detention policy, spying without warrants, and targeting individuals at home and abroad for torture, imprisonment, and even executive killing—including even American citizens—have been set in the last decade, precedents that in some cases would have appeared completely paranoid to predict even thirty years ago in the twilight of the Cold War.

4) Neither political party is led by or represents Americans strongly opposed to either civilian-killing drones flying over other countries, or domestic surveillance drones.

5) The tolerance the American people have toward various government measures that would have likely been regarded as obscene and totalitarian only a few years ago appears to have grown.

6) Domestic law enforcement has taken on an increasingly militaristic flavor in recent decades, thanks to the wars on drugs, crime, and terrorism. SWAT teams used to be unusual and now occur dozens of times a day. Nearly every city and town has a police force associated with the federal government and employing increasingly formidable military hardware and tactics in its enforcement of the law.

7) While it might be hard to imagine Americans tolerating drones being used to target and even kill suspects on American soil in the next year or so, it no longer seems crazy to expect such practices would be tolerated, even cheered, within a generation, given the steady decline in American concern for civil liberties and the frightening trajectory of domestic law enforcement and military policy.

8) It would indeed be preferable for most of us to live in a country where the latter point would sound completely absurd.

9) If we ever lived in such a country we do not now.

10) Americans by the tens of millions have to snap out of it, wake up and smell the not-so-slowly creeping fascism, or else we will all likely wake up to find ourselves in a country completely unrecognizable as being remotely free.

14 Comment(s)

  1. Why are these “high officials of the US government” being allowed to continue??? Shouldn’t they be arrested by the military and detained indefinitely for their acts against the Constitution and the citizens of this country?

    Kacey | Feb 13, 2012 | Reply

  2. It seems to me that at the end of 1984 by George Orwell, it was never made clear whether the eternal state of war was real. It was a perfectly reasonable suposition that the three major blocs in that story were all conspiring against the common citizens, and each bombarding their own citizens just to preserve themselves in power.

    John H. Woll | Feb 13, 2012 | Reply

  3. I don’t think we should have drones flying over the whole country looking over our shoulder but it seems they would be very useful in controlling the border against the drug cartels. If we armed them with missiles like they do in Ppakistan, we could take out the gangs of drug runners quite nicely.

    Muskrat Johnson | Feb 13, 2012 | Reply

  4. It is just left-wing poppy cock to suggest that the drones kill far more civilians than combatants and to suggest that, is just siding with them. Terrorist always claim large numbers of civilian casualties to bolster anti-US sentiment.

    Muskrat Johnson | Feb 13, 2012 | Reply

  5. It is not “left-wing” to be concerned with civilian deaths, the laws of war, violations of civil liberties, presidential overreach, or the dictatorial power grabs of the Obama administration. Most left-wingers support the empire and its crack downs and wars.

    Anthony Gregory | Feb 13, 2012 | Reply

  6. “Muskrat Johnson” wants to take us all way up sh*t creek while Obama wants to do Skynet one better.

    hanmeng | Feb 13, 2012 | Reply

  7. Those “High Level Government Officials” a.k.a Obama need to go. He has said repeatedly that “The Constitution is flawed...and is a collections of negative liberties telling what the government can’t do...” Duh! That is the freaking point! The founding fathers didn’t want a European-style KING! But a Republic that will PROTECT the liberties of it’s people.

    The more people who wake up to the fact that Obama isn’t their “savior” but one of the main players in the U.S.’s decline into fascism, the better off we all will be. Bush did have the Patriot Act, but even he drew the line at due process in the courts. Obama doesn’t care about Congress or our rule of law and takes active measures to bypass due process at every opportunity.

    Jim | Feb 14, 2012 | Reply

  8. Excellent piece. Right on.

    richard | Feb 14, 2012 | Reply

  9. There will be drug cartels and drug violence so long as the government wages a drug war. The more the government tries to crack down on drugs, rather than letting civil society deal with drug problems, the more the drug problems, and all the associated violence, will get worse.

    Anthony Gregory | Feb 14, 2012 | Reply

  10. Exactly!!

    Globalkooler | Feb 14, 2012 | Reply

  11. Obama didn’t write the NDAA, Congress did. Furthermore, it was passed by a margin that would have overridden an Obama veto had he chosen to do so.

    Paul | Feb 14, 2012 | Reply

  12. Really? President Bush and due process of the law? Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld and other cases definitely say otherwise

    DJ | Feb 14, 2012 | Reply

  13. DJ, who is defending Bush?

    Anthony Gregory | Feb 15, 2012 | Reply

  14. Now is the time to start developing defenses against this unwarranted and illegal violation of our civil rights. For anyone brainy enough it is time to develop a method to shoot these things out of the sky. Seem far fetched? I don’t think so. So for anyone out there with the intelligence get to work.

    John Frings | Apr 13, 2012 | Reply

5 Trackback(s)

  1. Feb 15, 2012: from Exclusive: PowerPoint Shows Drone Industry’s Lobbying Plan To Expand Over Domestic, Law Enforcement Markets : Republic Report
  2. Feb 15, 2012: from Drone-makers are writing the drone laws | OzHouse Alt News
  3. Feb 17, 2012: from Drone Industry’s Lobbying Plan To Expand Over Domestic, Law Enforcement Markets « Victors Post
  4. Feb 17, 2012: from Drone Industry’s Lobbying Plan To Expand Over Domestic, Law Enforcement Markets | The Hive Daily – News You Don't See Everywhere
  5. Feb 18, 2012: from ‘Presidents Day’ Weekend (yech) » Scott Lazarowitz's Blog

Post a Comment