The Costs of the Build Back Better Act

The Congressional Budget Office released its estimate of the costs of H.R. 5376, a.k.a. the “Build Back Better” Act. According to the CBO’s budget math, the much smaller spending bill that we talked about a few months ago doesn’t cost $0 as President Biden claimed it would. In fact, it doesn’t cost anywhere close to $0. Despite that, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to pass the spending bill.

Rather than trying to describe how much it does cost in both new spending and taxes, it’s easier to show you. The chart below reveals how much new spending and taxes the CBO expects from the shrunken bill over each of the next 10 years.

HR 5376 Build Back Better Act New Spending and Tax Revenues, 2022-2031

All the new spending adds up to $1.68 trillion from 2022 through 2031. All the increases in the federal government’s revenues add up to $1.27 trillion over the next decade. The CBO indicates the gap between the two is $367 billion. The chart below shows how the CBO thinks the Build Back Better Act will impact the national debt each year. Note the vertical scale on the chart changes from billions to trillions.

Impact of Build Back Better Budget Act on Annual Government Deficits and National Debt, 2022-2031,

Without the Build Back Budget Act, two of the next 10 years would have had smaller than trillion-dollar deficits. With it, the CBO indicates trillion-dollar deficits are guaranteed. The U.S. national debt will swell under the Build Back Better Act’s excessive spending.

A Huge Caveat

The CBO’s analysis assumes the budget gimmicks used to make the Build Back Better Act seem affordable won’t be ditched. Which anyone who has watched politicians spend money in Washington D.C. knows they’ll do as soon as they get the chance. So how much will the Build Back Better Act really cost?

Writing at the Foundation for Economic Education, Brad Polumbo estimates its real cost to American households:

The true cost of the legislation, once one accounts for budget gimmicks and dishonest political rhetoric, is up to $4.9 trillion. That’s an astounding $32,000 per federal taxpayer.

And most of this money would go to wasteful government programs and counterproductive expansions of the welfare state.

For example, the bill funnels billions into electric vehicle subsidies that make almost zero difference on carbon emissions and pad the pockets of wealthy consumers. It similarly wastes billions funding a “Civilian Climate Corps” that would pay people to do environmental activism that even proponents admit won’t reduce emissions. It puts hundreds of billions toward subsidies for healthcare, childcare, and housing that will ultimately push the cost of these sectors even higher and prove counterproductive.

So, too, the Build Back Better agenda openly violates President Biden’s promises that he wouldn’t raise taxes on anyone earning less than $400,000. It raises billions in new taxes on nicotine products that millions of working-class Americans regularly consume and hikes corporate taxes that ultimately fall on workers’ shoulders via lower wages. It does all this while, rather hypocritically, giving the rich a net tax cut.

The Build Back Better spending bill is quite possibly one of the worst pieces of budgetary legislation in U.S. history. With 232 years of history to draw upon, that’s saying something.

Craig Eyermann is a Research Fellow at the Independent Institute.
Beacon Posts by Craig Eyermann | Full Biography and Publications
Comments
  • Catalyst
  • MyGovCost.org
  • FDAReview.org
  • OnPower.org
  • elindependent.org