Members of the California Association of Professional Scientists spoke with the Globe on condition of anonymity. “We are toxicologists, epidemiologists, and trained problem solvers. But we haven’t been engaged,” they said. In the early going of the pandemic, they offered to work with the governor but got no answer.

The scientists charge that, by avoiding them, Gov. Newsom is undermining public confidence in science. “Sound science would not have produced the outcome today in California,” they claim, “or [would have] at least effectively communicated with the public, what exactly was needed.” When they tried to protest, “everyone was told to stay in their own lane.” If any formal grievances arose, they were not mentioned in the article.

The anonymous scientists, who also claim they are underpaid, did not outline the science that would have produced a different outcome than current conditions in California. They provided no data on the true mortality rate of COVID-19, the recovery rate, or the seasonality of the coronavirus. They might have enhanced their claims with scientific analysis of the state guidelines for private gatherings that have prompted so many complaints. An epidemiologist or toxicologist who wants to be taken seriously should have something to say on that front.

On the other hand, many Californians might agree that Gov. Newsom’s zeal to issue public health edicts surpasses the need to detail the science behind his restrictions. Californians have also noted that the governor proceeded to violate the state guidelines with a bash at the upscale French Laundry in Napa County. Gov. Newsom has not detailed how many cases resulted from that violation of the rules.

The post Is Gov. Newsom Avoiding Science-Based Pandemic Policies? appeared first on The Beacon.

“Your signatures might literally save CIRM, [California Institute for Regenerative Medicine] helping us put a $5.5 billion renewal bill on the ballot,” Reed wrote. “Its purpose is to fight chronic diseases, like COVID-19, the dread coronavirus—and so much more!!” Reed provided a website with directions to print out 16 pages, including an “address block to fill out, with yourself as the signature collector, and then four (just four!) signatures from people in your county. Your next door neighbors, perhaps.” This was to be mailed into Melissa King, executive director of Americans for Cures. Any fraud in the process was ignored by secretary of state Alex Padilla, who greenlighted the measure for November 3. 

The chairman of Americans for Cures is Robert Klein, the real estate tycoon who backed Proposition 71 in 2004. Back then, Klein deployed celebrities such as Christopher Reeve, Brad Pitt, and Michael J. Fox to tout life-saving cures the $3 billion would surely bring. The San Francisco Chronicle reported in 2018, “not a single federally approved therapy has resulted from CIRM-funded science. The predicted financial windfall has not materialized.”

In September 2020, CIRM reported that the FDA had “granted breakthrough therapy designation” to the antibody therapeutic Magrolimab, funded by CIRM in the trial stage. As the CIRM report notes, the breakthrough therapy designation is “intended to help expedite the development of new treatments” and Magrolimab is undergoing another trial that is “one of the last steps before seeking FDA approval for widespread commercial use.” As full FDA approval awaits, CIRM still falls far short of the cures, treatments and therapies promised in 2004. Taxpayers might wonder where all the money went.

Also in September, Harold Shapiro, head of an Institute of Medicine study of CIRM in 2012, told Capitol Weekly that CIRM directors “make proposals to themselves, essentially, regarding what should be funded. They cannot exert independent oversight.” And as voters might recall, Klein designed CIRM to remain off limits from nearly all legislative oversight.

“The state currently owes about $1 billion toward the debt created by Proposition 71,” KQED reports. “The price tag to pay off the new bond will be about $260 million per year for about 30 years.”

The post Stem Cell Boondoggle Bloats by $5.5 Billion appeared first on The Beacon.