EPA Fuel Efficiency Standards: Goals Are Not Policies
By Randall Holcombe • Tuesday August 28, 2012 11:25 AM PDT • 2 Comments
The EPA issued new rules requiring the average fuel efficiency of new cars and trucks to get 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. President Obama said, “These fuel standards represent the single most important step we’ve ever taken to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.” The new standard is a goal, not a policy. The announcement of this goal does not specify how it will be accomplished, and does not explain how the Obama administration can hope to enforce it. If the president is re-elected in November, this goal applies nine years after his second term will have ended.
I commented on this specific announcement because it came out today, but my complaint is a general one. Too often, politicians announce goals as if they are policies, but goals without policies to accomplish them are nothing more than wishful thinking.
President Obama said the new standards are “the single most important step we’ve ever taken to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.” How does announcing that we hope our vehicles have better gas mileage by 2025 do anything to reduce our dependence on foreign oil? If the president seriously believes that announcing a goal he hopes we’ll meet in 13 years is the single most important step we’ve taken, that is a damning indictment of everything we’ve done in the past.
For statements about what politicians hope to accomplish to be credible, they have to explain what specific policies they will enact to accomplish those goals. Without specific policies behind them, I’ll say again, goals like this are nothing more than wishful thinking.
Tags: Economics, Energy, Environment, Nanny State, Natural Resources, Politics, Regulation ![]()



















Wishful thinking or maybe politics as usual.
richard | Aug 28, 2012 | Reply
Buried in the reporting on this matter is that when Obama issued the bailouts for GM and Chrysler he got them to agree to execute on standards of this type as a condition of the bailout. So, its not quite as toothless as it might seem at first appearance.
Elbonian | Aug 28, 2012 | Reply