Virginia Interposes to Protect Citizens from NDAA
By Melancton Smith • Friday March 2, 2012 8:33 AM PDT • 7 Comments
States are starting to show concern about certain provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”), which allows the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens who are alleged to be terrorists or aiding terrorists. The President has “promised” to exempt citizens from indefinite detention, but that does not change what the law says or that he can always change his mind when he wants to.
Concerned about the provisions of the NDAA, the Virginia Legislature is acting to interpose to protect its citizens. According to the new statute:
1. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, no agency of the Commonwealth as defined in § 8.01-385 of the Code of Virginia, political subdivision of the Commonwealth as defined in § 8.01-385 of the Code of Virginia, employee of either acting in his official capacity, or member of the Virginia National Guard or Virginia Defense Force, when such a member is serving in the Virginia National Guard or the Virginia Defense Force on official state duty, shall aid an agency of the armed forces of the United States in the conduct of the investigation, prosecution, or detention of any citizen pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 1541 as provided by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (P.L. 112-18, § 1021) if such aid would place any state agency, political subdivision, employee of such state agency or political subdivision, or aforementioned member of the Virginia National Guard or the Virginia Defense Force in violation of the United States Constitution, the Constitution of Virginia, and provision of the Code of Virginia, any act of the General Assembly, or any regulation of the Virginia Administrative Code.
In other words, the state is refusing to aid federal authorities in the execution or enforcement of the offending provisions of the NDAA. This passed the state House by a vote of 96-4 and the state Senate by a vote of 39-1. The state governor has promised a veto, but the large majorities will prevent this. The Tenth Amendment Center has this story on the passage of the new law.
This is exciting to see states stand up to Leviathan and interpose to protect the people. Such acts have not been uncommon in American History. Indeed, the Framers of the Constitution expected the states to act as a check on usurpation of the national government.
For those of you interested in doing more reading on state nullification and interposition, I recommend the following books:
Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy
Tags: Civil Liberties, Constitution, Defense, Law, Liberty, Personal Liberty, Power, Presidential Power ![]()




















Tom Woods discusses his book “Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century” on C-SPAN2′s BookTV here.
And for a few laughs, see his brief video Interview with a Zombie and the Blooper Reel.
Anon. | Mar 2, 2012 | Reply
cool continue to uphold the constitution
william reed | Mar 3, 2012 | Reply
YOU GO, VIRGINIA!
Winston Smith | Mar 3, 2012 | Reply
HELL. YEAH. Texas? Where are you?
clay davis | Mar 4, 2012 | Reply
This is required by all States. This is what States Rights are about. New York next!
Buffalo Valerie | Mar 4, 2012 | Reply
Although I am happy that our state senate and representatives OVERWHELMINGLY consider the NDAA a bad law... I am APPALLED that our U.S. Congressman Scott Rigell (for whom I voted) voted YES for the NDAA and our Governor Bob McDonnell (for whom I voted for is promising to VETO this??? This is for you both!!! Damn RINOs!! ┌∩┐ (*¿*) ┌∩┐
Walt | Mar 4, 2012 | Reply
All the guidance we need is in the Ten Commandments and the U.S. Constitution, we don’t need or want any other.
Bob | May 12, 2012 | Reply