Love One Another



It is fortuitous that the 10th anniversary of 9/11 has fallen on a Sunday, and I hope pulpits everywhere resonated with Jesus’s message in the Sermon on the Mount:

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.

Earlier this summer, we spent an unforgettable 10 days participating in the C.S. Lewis Foundation’s triennial Oxbridge Conference, held at Oxford and Cambridge, and featuring an array of the most inspiring, talented, intelligent, provocative, and thoughtful speakers, performers, and leaders from across a rich spectrum. One morning’s thought-provoking message was delivered by Richard Kannwischer, Senior Pastor of St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church in Newport Beach, CA, on the subject of that most-favored concept of our time, “tolerance.”

By substituting the word “tolerance” for “love” in many familiar passages, Rev. Kannwischer effectively made a vitally important point, and it’s an exercise I urge you to try with any passage, song, or quote, dear to your heart. For example:

How do I tolerate thee? Let me count the ways.
I tolerate thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach, ...
I tolerate thee with the breath,
Smiles, tears, of all my life! — and, if God choose,
I shall but tolerate thee better after death.

Surely no lover would succeed in wooing the object of his tolerance with such lack of passion.

It is an excellent reminder that while a call for “tolerance” is all the rage these days, God has called Christians to a more difficult standard: Love.

It may indeed be impossible for mere mortals to achieve this calling—how difficult to contemplate loving one who just caused us grievous loss through exercising their own blind hatred.

But, search as I might, I can find no attribution to Jesus of anything but clear commands that we must love—not sometimes, not some people, but always and everyone:

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.

Love your neighbor as yourself.

When asked “Who is my neighbor?,” Jesus responded by telling the Parable of the Good Samaritan—Samaritans and Jews traditionally hating one another—helping a stranger, a Jew robbed, beaten, and passed by by his fellow-Jew and a priest.

Jesus modeled just how far this love and mercy was to go, using his last strength to enter a plea for the agents of the evil empire who were torturing him to death:

Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.

Indeed, throughout his short life, Jesus was consistent and unequivocal in his message:

A new command I give you: Love one another.

and

If you love me, you will obey what I command.

For the first few hundred years following Jesus’s life, his followers stayed true to his dictates, and as Rodney Stark has shown in The Rise of Christianity, this fledgling movement grew exponentially, despite widespread persecution and martyrdom at the hands of the Roman empire. Of those followers whose deaths are recorded, a theme of emulating Jesus’s call for forgiveness for their persecutors runs throughout.

Today, American politicians claim to be Christians while unleashing unspeakable horrors on innocents abroad, and imposing growing tyranny on the formerly free people they were sworn to serve. Is it any wonder the number of Americans calling themselves followers of Christ shrinks year after year?

Yet “Love one another” is what people just do, naturally. In the aftermath of every disaster, natural and man-made, stories abound of extraordinary acts of heroism, compassion, and charity by common folk to utter strangers. Government, by contrast, exploits tragedy to aggregate power unto itself, using fear and fomenting hate as its greatest allies. I suspect that left to ourselves, most Americans would have accepted that the events of 9/11 were caused by a small band of zealots and would have happily egged on the efforts of those who proposed going after the perpetrators on an individualized basis, not to be hated but to be honorably held accountable for their acts. Instead, we let ourselves be duped, and the consequences have been horrific, indeed. Which ought to leave us running back to Jesus: the most powerful tool against any and all evil is indeed to Love one another—and that means letting none of God’s children be victimized, no matter how many claims are made that “the ends justify the means.”

6 Comment(s)

  1. Beautifully expressed, Mary.

    Robert Higgs | Sep 12, 2011 | Reply

  2. Thank you, Bob.

    I see now that I’m getting caught up on Facebook today that we were thinking along the same lines. Your thoughts are *always* beautifully expressed!

    In gratitude,
    Mary

    Mary L. G. Theroux | Sep 12, 2011 | Reply

  3. What a perfect message, Mary! Thank you for your inspiring reminder of love being tolerance. It is the foundation of our Constitution and my spiritual progress. I consider it my job to have love lead me in my daily life with each encounter.

    Another message about 9/11 shared Sunday on the tenth anniversary is the following one hour lecture from Boston. If you take the time to listen to this, I know it will help all of us to love one another without judgment, which is the loudest message that I have gotten from Jesus.

    http://christianscience.com/online-lectures/2011/08/04/10-years-later-love-is-the-victor/

    Love, Julie

    Julie Sheppard | Sep 13, 2011 | Reply

  4. I too commend you on a “beautifully expressed” piece.
    However, can we take it one step further, and recognize that our clear Biblical mandate is to “love one another” without any reservation.
    However, “tolerance” is another matter, in my opinion.
    I am not mandated to “tolerate” the behavior, nor the teachings, of those that are in serious conflict with my beliefs.
    Tolerance is a large first step down the road to decline in our civilization.
    Thus, we love one another, but we must not teach tolerance of those actions that are outside our moral and/or spiritual being.

    Dick Hagerty | Sep 13, 2011 | Reply

  5. Good distinction, Dick—every parent knows one loves a child best by not tolerating bad behavior. And that such love is, indeed, transcendent.

    Mary Theroux | Sep 13, 2011 | Reply

  6. First, Mary thanks for this, it gives cause to think. Actually, I would disagree with you on this Dick however. Tolerance will not “lead us to the decline of civilization”, rather it is the definition if civil-ization. This of course is not to say that you out not defend yourself when your rights are violated, but to tolerate views different from one’s own is the highest form of civilization. I would argue that it is our intolerance of all things Arab, or Mexican that has brought us to the level of hate that we now endure.

    To this end, the reason why there is such a thing as military chaplains is because (I believe) that the English language contains too many words for some things, and too few for others. “Love” falls into that later category. It is used to describe far too many things. “You are my wife and I love you.”, “while I can’t get along with my brother, I still love him.”, “my Amy, I just love that shirt on you!”, “I really love my new car!”, “I love the way that idiot makes a fool of himself every time he opens his mouth”, “I love the Miami Dolphins.”, “I love the fact that our tanks are faster and have more armor than theirs.”, etc... etc... If we could truly “LOVE” as the lord intended, we would not be at war, because love is tolerant…

    In America (and sadly worldwide), “love” is just a word. As such, if we could all strive to tolerate one another, we could at least avoid war, and at least with that, while we may fall far short of truly loving one another, we might spend less time hating one another.

    You do make a good point Mary with your example of loving your child but not tolerating his behavior, but that example ought to be limited to one’s actual children…as I have always argued, we need to spend less time pretending that we are the parents of everyone else on earth… And recognize that it’s not about “I’m right and you’re wrong”, but rather that it’s about – or should be “it’s possible that we are both right – or wrong, but neither has the right to interfere with the other.”… and THAT is how one tolerates, and I would argue is a much higher form of love than we currently share with the world… and perhaps the highest form of love to which we could aspire…

    joe4liberty | Sep 15, 2011 | Reply

1 Trackback(s)

  1. Sep 12, 2011: from Tasty Tidbits 9/12/11 « Tipsy Teetotaler

Post a Comment