The pivotal alternative to Obamacare . . .
Priceless: Curing the Healthcare Crisis, by John C. Goodman. Order Today!

Uncle Sam’s Bloody Fingerprints on Mexican Drug War Violence



Federal officials are pointing fingers at one another over a ludicrous plan to infiltrate Mexican drug smuggling groups that went totally awry. Under Operation Fast and Furious, the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Bureau allowed top Mexican drug dealers to purchase weapons, hoping to trace them back to kingpins. They lost track of these weapons, some of which were later found at the scene of violent crimes. The ATF’s chief is blaming the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration for not notifying it adequately of the armed dealers who happened to be informants of the latter two agencies. So we have two federal law enforcement organizations keeping poor tabs on drug dealers with whom they’re in cahoots and another U.S. law enforcement organization allowing these people to get weapons in a totally misguided attempt to find and stop criminal higher ups.

Of course, this only scratches the surface. Under Obama, U.S. financing of the Mexican drug warriors has reached record heights. Obama asked for $15 billion last year—far, far more than was spent under the Bush administration. And it is this overt activity, along with domestic drug war enforcement, far more than the ATF’s covert shenanigans, that is the real problem.

In the last five years, over 37,000 have died in Mexico’s drug violence. And many Mexicans recognize the ultimate cause: Drug prohibition. It was not a big news story in the United States, but a few months ago thousands of Mexicans took to the streets protesting the drug policy being enforced by Mexican authorities and sponsored, actually imposed, by Washington, DC.

It is the ban on drugs that causes drug violence. It really is as simple as that. Just as alcohol prohibition led to turf wars and Al Capone and organized crime, prohibitions on other substances lead to similar black market violence. But it is much worse in the case of the war on cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and other illicit drugs than it ever was with alcohol prohibition, because the U.S. government has effectively strongarmed and bribed the rest of the world in support of its utopian and impossible crusade to rid the world of drugs. This has skewered U.S. diplomacy to the most degenerate depths. In Afghanistan, the U.S. was sending tens of millions of dollars, all the way up through 2001, to the Taliban in support of its was in opium. In Thailand, the U.S. government supported the regime as it conducted a policy of outright murdering drug suspects by the thousands. In Colombia, the U.S. has poisoned peasants’ food crops in an effort to stamp out cocaine. Perhaps Mexico is just the worst example of Washington’s horrendous drug policy spreading the bloodshed internationally.

There is no reason for all this drug violence other than the fact that the markets are illegal. Many Americans want to blame the Mexican drug violence on something else, but this really is the explanation: Washington DC’s war on drugs has created a wave of terror and mass destruction within the borders of our neighbor to the south, which has also bled over somewhat into the United States. I cannot think of any other government or organization that has unleashed as much havoc with its policies inside the United States as the U.S. has, through its drug polices, brought about in Mexico.

Americans often want to blame the problem on something else: Mexicans, or the drugs themselves. They call for more crackdowns on illegal aliens and harsher penalties and more paramilitary forces funded with U.S. tax dollars. But these are all counterproductive approaches. If you truly want to stop this violence—which is a moral imperative, given what is happening in Mexico—you must support the end of drug prohibition in America and particularly the policy of forcing and subsidizing other nations to do America’s drug war bidding. Just like Trotsky thought Communism could not work in one nation, and so had to be spread, country by country, until it consumed the world, so do the drug warriors believe their equally unattainable dreams of drug central planning cannot be achieved without spreading their violent collectivism to other nations. Instead, it is time to end the Progressive project of drug prohibition altogether.

One last note for conservatives: U.S. politicians have used the Mexican drug violence as a rationale for calling for more gun control. This happened in the 1920s too, in regard to the organized crime that resulted from alcohol prohibition, and culminating in the first federal gun laws. They can take away all our freedoms, tens of thousands will continue to die in the drug war, and drugs will still be readily available. Drugs are notoriously available in prison, despite the totalitarian controls and surveillance inflicted upon the inmate population. The drug warriors can turn all of America into a prison and the drug war will be no closer to being won. Our neighboring countries can descend into full-blown war zones, and the drug war will be as futile a program as ever. Anyone pretending to care about the huge loss of life on the border and in Mexico, the rapacious violence of gang activity, the loss of our freedoms in this country, or fiscal sanity, has to confront the truth head on: The drug war is an absolute and inevitable disaster on every level, and it must be ended immediately and completely.

6 Comment(s)

  1. Well argued, and, if truth be told, all too obvious to anyone observing reality. But the stupid drug war will not be ended until America’s economic system implodes. There are too many parasitical bureaucrats living off this fraud known as the war on drugs for the charade to end without an economic shock.

    As counter-intuitive as it may sound, I look forward to the day that the dollar falls off a cliff. The status quo cannot last. The sooner our money goes to zero, the sooner we can start anew.

    Think of the possibilities:
    - an end to the drug war;
    - an end to silly imperial ambitions, and with it, the closing of hundreds of obsolete military bases and the return of countless American mercenaries;
    - the abolition of the odious central bank;
    - the merciful stoppage of the Ponzi schemes known as Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, and the rest of the immoral welfare state;
    - the renewal of a non-interventionist foreign policy;
    - the restoration of civil liberties, accompanied by the elimination of the awful Homeland Security Administration, and its modern day Gestapo, the TSA.

    Could it really mean the return to a constitutional government and a limited government republic? A guy can dream, can’t he?

    Steve Hogan | Jul 10, 2011 | Reply

  2. Excellent piece and posted. Thanks.

    Brock Townsend | Jul 11, 2011 | Reply

  3. Steve Hogan said, “Think of the possibilities:... the return of countless American mercenaries”

    Not that I don’t want that to happen, but That’s a scary possibility. Roving bands of unemployed mercenaries,... what could possibly go wrong?

    clark | Jul 12, 2011 | Reply

  4. Spot on.

    John Harrison | Jul 13, 2011 | Reply

  5. Drug cartels traffic in dangerous substances that should be interdicted in the interest of public safety. The alternative to drug enforcement is to abandon the cause and let them do it openly, in broad daylight, in every neighborhood including YOURS. I don’t want it legalized and taxed because that would create a moral hazard in which government became dependent on street drugs for revenue. At that point our government is totally compromised and corrupted.

    Cindy Hornick | Jul 14, 2011 | Reply

  6. Cindy, You assume that government central planning (i.e., socialism) is both moral and efficient to address drug use. However, we know that this is not the case, right? Private property owners should rightfully set the standards for behavior on their property, not some bureaucrat or police official. You are correct about moral hazard, but this results from “the tragedy of the commons” when the control of property is socialized in the hands of governments. The answer is to privatize the streets, parks, schools, etc., to the citizenry and allow them to set the rules cooperatively and privately.

    The fact that governments fail and fail miserably to control the drug trade and use should be a clear lesson here. Indeed, the very worse drug use is found in prisons! And as Anthony Gregory well notes, the “war on drugs” produces massive violent crime from the moral hazard that harms innocent people and all at a gigantic cost to taxpayers. So, the conclusion is clearly to end government’s involvement.

    Please see the following book:

    Drug War Crimes: The Consequences of Prohibition, by Jeffrey A. Miron

    David Theroux | Jul 14, 2011 | Reply

1 Trackback(s)

  1. Jul 12, 2011: from A Few Random Morning Links … | The Pretense of Knowledge

Post a Comment