First They Came for the Happy Meals
By Anthony Gregory • Thursday November 4, 2010 10:38 AM PDT • 5 Comments
San Francisco, a wonderful American city known for its traditions of tolerance and freedom, banned Happy Meals. My home county of Santa Clara already had. So this isn’t just the most far-left radicals pushing this agenda; it’s the center-left progressives who dominate the Bay Area.
Some friends have wondered why I care about this so much, especially in a country at war, with a Bill of Rights in tatters and the dollar slipping every day. It just seems to me there’s something vaguely. . . anti-American. . . about all this. This is to say, American culture has long sustained a very statist system in terms of foreign policy, Social Security, public schools, regulations, wars on drugs, gun controls, peripheral acts of censorship, corporatist subsidies, middle-class welfare, national-security excuses for eroding civil liberties, and so forth.
But Happy Meals? They are a ritual, however vulgar, tacky and easily associated with public health concerns, that is at the core of modern American culture. And I make no apologies for a society where children want little more for lunch than a lame hamburger, some soggy fries, and a cup of sweetened water, all wrapped up in a box with easy crosswords plastered on it, and accompanied by a junk piece of plastic made in China.
This is one element of living in a free society. Even a semi-free society. Parents will occasionally buy their kids fast food, and that food will sometimes come with a toy. It’s the Crackerjack thing. It’s the prize in a box of sugary cereal. It’s what it means to be an American.
Is there a health epidemic? If so, stand up to the corn lobby and end corn subsidies. If McDonald’s is really so unnatural, and maybe it is, it won’t stand free market competition. Address the horrible school lunch programs. Better yet, rethink this whole program of forcing kids to sit in classrooms for 8 hours a day. Stop externalizing the costs of health care.
But the prohibition of Happy Meals is a shot across the bow of American freedom. It is an attack on American institutions, family rights, common sense, free enterprise, and the particular meaning of childhood in our culture. Yes, there’s a thousand things worse than a Happy Meal ban, but there’s a million things worse than a Happy Meal. The war on American fun continues apace. And I ask those who think this is petty—what’s next? They are already taxing lemonade stands and banning Happy Meals. They are putting more cops in public schools and monitoring children at every turn. They are spying on students at home through their laptops, adulterating classic cartoons by purging them of images of tobacco and persecuting pupils for drawing pictures of weapons and bringing aspirin to class. Poor kids.
Tags: Culture, Family, Food, Government subsidies, Healthcare, Nanny State, Politics, Regulation, The State, Welfare ![]()




















I was at the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Health and Hospital Committee meeting last week when Dan Peddycord, Santa Clara County’s Public Health Director, positively wet his pants with glee that the Feds had given them tax dollars to follow “the tobacco model” in harassing people over what they eat.
Daryl Davis | Nov 4, 2010 | Reply
Awesome post Anthony. I especially like the title. The happy meal: just another one of Mencken’s “endless series of hobgoblins”
Paul Mollon | Nov 5, 2010 | Reply
Better to live under self-serving, venal tyrants than under do-gooders who just want to help me.
Do-gooders of the last century:
Adolf Hitler. He just wanted to “purify” the Germans of foreign elements.
Jozef Stalin. He just wanted to make an Utopia for the workers.
Mao Zedong. Same as Stalin.
And a whole raft of American do-gooders who just want to make life better for us all.
Mac | Nov 9, 2010 | Reply
Personally, I think that it’s a great idea (banning Happy Meals). Really, think about it. They are unhealthy, they contain junk toys that Mom and Dad have to pick-up when Jr. leaves them lying around, and they come in a box that just adds to the trash pile (who needs a box?)
This is just one very much overdue step toward better control over our youth, and eventually the population as a while. After all, we didn’t become a Super Power until we learned that we had to control the way our citizens think. That had to begin with the children, so we implemented the Prussian “school” model, and look at the success!!! Our citizens no longer protest against the enlightened decisions of our leaders. Thanks to the ‘school’ system, we shall never risk another Boston Massacre (look at how many people died as a result of the American war for Independence). We as Americans are exactly today where we would have been had we never expelled the crown and all of those people would have lived to old age (to think of all of those boys freezing to death at Valley Forge when they could have been home in front of a warm fire).
Now, it’s time to control the food supply the way we have controlled the education system. If they have to grovel to eat, the masses will be less likely to question our authority... next if we could only take the logical step to get this housing ‘thing’ under control. Really, why should people be able to own property? Remember, people will fight to defend what they own, can we have a peaceful society with people willing to ‘fight’? – Not that they’ll have the energy if we can control what they eat. (see “sarcasm” in Webster’s revised 109th)
joe4liberty | Nov 15, 2010 | Reply