The pivotal alternative to Obamacare . . .
Priceless: Curing the Healthcare Crisis, by John C. Goodman. Order Today!

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Obamacare Is Unconstitutional



In a new interview with Ashley Martella on Newsmax TV, Judge Andrew P. Napolitano discusses the current court challenges to Obamacare. He details why the health care reform just adopted by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama is unconstitutional and the U.S. Supreme Court will strike down major portions of it. (Judge Napolitano is author of the new book, Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History.)

In the interview, Judge Napolitano also addresses the following:

• He believes America is in danger of becoming “a fascist country,” which he defines as “private ownership, but government control.” He adds, “The government doesn’t have the money to own anything. But it has the force and the threat of violence to control just about anything it wants. That will rapidly expand under President Obama, unless and until the midterm elections give us a midterm correction – which everyone seems to think, and I’m in that group, is about to come our way.

• Napolitano believes the federal government lacks the legal authority to order citizens to purchase healthcare insurance. The Congress [is] ordering human beings to purchase something that they might not want, might not need, might not be able to afford, and might not want— that’s never happened in our history before,” Napolitano says. “My gut tells me that too is unconstitutional, because the Congress doesn’t have that kind of power under the Constitution.”

• The sweetheart deals in the healthcare reform bill used that persuaded Democrats to vote for it—the Louisiana Purchase, Cornhusker Kickback, Gatorade Exception and others—create “a very unique and tricky constitutional problem” for Democrats, because they treat citizens differently based on which state they live in, running afoul of the Constitution’s equal protection clause according to Napolitano. “So these bennies or bribes, whatever you want, or horse trading as it used to be called, clearly violate equal protection by forcing people in the other states to pay the bills of the states that don’t have to pay what the rest of us do,” Napolitano says.

• Exempting union members from the so-called “Cadillac tax” on expensive health insurance policies, while imposing that tax on other citizens, is outright discrimination according to Napolitano. “The government cannot draw a bright line, with fidelity to the Constitution and the law, on the one side of which everybody pays, and the other side of which some people pay. It can’t say, ‘Here’s a tax, but we’re only going to apply it to nonunion people. Here’s a tax, and we’re only going to apply it to graduates of Ivy League institutions.’ The Constitution does not permit that type of discrimination.”

• Politicians from both parties routinely disregard the Constitutional limits imposed on them by the nation’s founding document, Napolitano says. “The problem with the Constitution is not any structural problem,” says Napolitano. “The problem with the constitution is that those who take an oath to uphold it don’t take their oath seriously. For example, just a month ago in interviewing Congressman Jim Clyburn, who’s the No. 3 ranking Democrat in the House, I said to him, Congressman Clyburn, can you tell me where in the Constitution the Congress is authorized to regulate healthcare? He said, ‘Judge, most of what we do down here,’ referring to Washington, ‘is not authorized by the Constitution. Can you tell me where in the Constitution we’re prohibited from regulating healthcare.’ Napolitano says that reflects a misunderstanding of what the Constitution actually is. “He’s turning the Constitution on its head, because Congress is not a general legislature,” he says. “It was not created in order to right every wrong. It exists only to legislate in the 17 specific, discrete, unique areas where the Constitution has given it power. All other areas of human area are reserved for the states.”

• Napolitano says that members of Congress infringe on Constitutional rights because they fail to recognize its basis. “They reject Jefferson’s argument, in the Declaration of Independence, that our rights come from our Creator, therefore they’re natural rights, therefore they can’t be legislated away,” Napolitano says. “They think they can legislate on any activity, regulate any behavior, tax any person or thing, as long as the politics will let them survive. They’re wrong, and with this healthcare legislation, they may be proven wrong, in a very direct and in-your-face way.”

4 Comment(s)

  1. Very well put. The crux of the matter is that Congress fails to recognize, or chooses to ignore, the fact that our central government is one of ENUMERATED powers. It cannot legally act in any and all areas of human endeavor simply because some members so desire. Congress, for example, can act only in those areas enumerated in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.

    Scott Haley | Mar 31, 2010 | Reply

  2. “The problem with the constitution is that those who take an oath to uphold it don’t take their oath seriously...”
    Actually, the problem with the Constitution is that it has no teeth. When a citizen breaks a law they are punished under the law. When a politician breaks the law, there are no consequences because the law (Constitution) is silent on its own enforcement. If we were to make one change that could change America as we know it – for the better – it would be this; Add penalties for violating the law (Constitution).

    joe4liberty | Mar 31, 2010 | Reply

  3. A Constitutional Amendment along those lines would be allowing a number of people of the United States standing to bring articles of impeachment against a member of Congress for violating the Constitution, and have the charge tried by the Senate. Clearly Democrats won’t impeach one of their own. Republicans, when caught in scandal, usually resign in disgrace, saving the trouble. Alternatively, an amendment that states adherence to an ideology inimical to individual liberty, such as socialism, communism, fascism, or any other form of Marxism or Islamism, shall disqualify an individual from holding federal office would also do the trick, since it’s the anti-individualists who seek to flout the law so egregiously.

    Robert | Apr 6, 2010 | Reply

  4. Not caring about your oath! For shame!

    Maggie Gray | May 18, 2010 | Reply

9 Trackback(s)

  1. Mar 28, 2010: from Stupak’s Health Care Vote Aborts The Pro-Life Movement | Real Zionist News
  2. Apr 19, 2010: from Judge Andrew Napolitano : Kevin Trudeau Show
  3. May 19, 2010: from The Civil War, Iraq and Obamacare (The War on Liberty) | SE Missouri Tenth Amendment Center
  4. May 21, 2010: from The Civil War, Iraq and Obamacare (The War on Liberty) | Missouri Tenth Amendment Center
  5. Aug 30, 2010: from Flushing the Constitution – Tenth Amendment Center
  6. Aug 31, 2010: from Obamacare Flushes the Constitution | STATESMAN SENTINEL
  7. Sep 1, 2010: from Militant Libertarian » Flushing the Constitution
  8. Sep 3, 2010: from FreeWestRadio.com » Blog Archive » Flushing the Constitution
  9. Nov 1, 2010: from The Northwest Report Questions Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio Over His Vote For Obamacare

Post a Comment