Halbrook to Testify in Hearings on Eric Holder for Attorney General
By David J. Theroux • Wednesday January 14, 2009 9:11 PM PDT • 12 Comments
The Senate Judiciary Committee is holding confirmation hearings on President-elect Barack Obama’s nomination of gun-control advocate Eric Holder for U.S. Attorney General on January 15-16. One of seven who is testifying, Independent Institute Research Fellow Stephen P. Halbrook is arguing against confirmation. Dr. Halbrook is the author of the Independent Institute book, The Founders’ Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms, the authoritative book on the Founders’ actual views that the Bill of Rights’ Second Amendment means an individual right. The book has formed the basis for the Institute’s Second Amendment Book Bomb and Dr. Halbrook’s Amici Curiae Brief in the Supreme Court case, District of Columbia v. Heller, on behalf of 55 members of the Senate, the Senate President, and 250 members of the House of Representatives.
A major advocate of gun control (see here, here, and here), Holder along with Janet Reno and other former Clinton Administration officials signed an Amicus Brief supporting the Washington D.C. government in the Heller case, claiming that “the Second Amendment did not protect an individual right to keep and bear arms.”
But Holder’s disregard for individual rights goes far further as, for example, in his lack of support for the Sixth Amendment right to counsel and the ability of defendants to receive a fair trial. As Deputy Attorney General under Clinton, he was directly involved in the Clinton pardon of billionaire fugitive Marc Rich, supported Internet censorship, and authorized the gunpoint, night-time kidnapping of the boy Elian Gonzalez who was sent from Miami to Cuba. And, here is a quote from an op-ed by Holder in which he further reveals his disregard for basic civil liberties that are protected in the Bill of Rights:
One measure that is an essential part of any [national security] plan is the need to tighten our nation’s gun laws, which allow the easy and legal sale of firearms to terrorists and criminals. . . . [F]ederal law does not require background checks on all firearms sales. In the interest of national security, this should be changed immediately. . . . To further strengthen the ability of law enforcement officials to track those suspected of terrorism or other criminal acts in this country, Congress should also pass legislation that would give the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms a record of every firearm sale. (Eric Holder, Jr., “Keeping Guns Away from Terrorists,” The Washington Post, Oct. 25, 2001)
Tags: Civil Liberties, Constitution, Criminal Justice, Elections, Gun Control, Law, Personal Liberty, Police, Politics, Presidential Power, Surveillance ![]()



















David;
Do you have video of Dr. Halbrook’s testimony?
I was not able to watch the hearings today, but did follow a couple of live blogs from work. From what I saw, gun control issues were dismissed early in the day.
From the NYT blog “The Caucus”:
“On the right to bear arms, under the 2nd Amendment, although Mr. Holder said he had sided with those who believed it did not confer an individual right, he pointed out the Supreme Court had ruled that it does in the recent gun law case involving Washington, D.C. “The reality is now the Supreme Court has spoken and that is now the law of the land,” and must be respected, he said.”
JR | Jan 15, 2009 | Reply
JR, the testimony will be tomorrow, I believe.
Anthony Gregory | Jan 15, 2009 | Reply
Thanks Anthony;
The wrap up from today’s hearing mentioned tomorrow’s testimony.
I may have to call in sick tomorrow to watch it.
JR | Jan 15, 2009 | Reply
I foresee a massively decentralized future for this country and people like Holder, who are strong Federalists, will soon be superfluous. The American Empire is over, but a whole lot of people don’t know it yet.
Jeff | Jan 15, 2009 | Reply
In the words of the famous movie 300. Come and get them!!!
300 | Jan 20, 2009 | Reply
http://www.cspan.org/Watch/watch.aspx?MediaId=HP-A-14336
start watching around the 1 hour mark to catch the testimony
pieter potgieter | Jan 21, 2009 | Reply